Re: [boost] [shifted_ptr] Review Request

Subject: Re: [boost] [shifted_ptr] Review Request
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-06 13:02:49

On 6 April 2011 11:43, Phil Bouchard <philippe_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_1/libs/smart_ptr/smarttests.htm
>>>
>>
>>
>> Here's another one here comparing shared_ptr<>, intrusive_ptr<> and
> garbage collected algorithms:
> http://hnxgc.harnixworld.com/benchmarks/GCBench/
>

Glancing at the code, I noticed that they aren't using make_shared or
allocate_shared, which any real world high performance app would most likely
be using just to cut the number of allocations in half.  Not a great
benchmark for this kind of thing...
-- 
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>  [phone]