Subject: Re: [boost] [trac] Misuse of trac system by spammer
From: Joachim Faulhaber (afojgo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-12 11:56:46
2011/4/12 Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>:
> On 4/12/2011 9:59 AM, Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
>> 2011/4/12 Rene Rivera<grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>:
>> Is there a standard way of dealing with the residual cases that slip
>> through the defenses?
> The standard way for any trac spam is to post here about it. But usually one
> of the trac admins notices before an email can go out. For example your post
> was only one of about 4 trac spams that we've deleted in the past week.
> Hence we tend to get to them quickly since we see them on the trac emails.
> But we do need to sleep ;-) Not sure why we've had a spike this past week
> though. And just think.. 4 is a spike now.. It used to be 100 was a spike
> some months ago!
Good work :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk