Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Review results for Boost.Locale library
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-25 15:12:34
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Monday, April 25, 2011, Artyom wrote:
> > From: Ryou Ezoe <boostcpp_at_[hidden]>
> > Sort by code point is not the best solution.
> > But at least, it's consistent if we use one encoding.
> No it is not, UCS encoding has different order
> in different representations:
> UTF-8 and UTF-32 order is consistent i.e.
Sorry if I'm adding to the pedantry, but Is UCS an "encoding"? My
completely non-expert impression was that UCS was a character set, and
UTF-8/16/32, etc. were different encodings of that character set?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk