Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Review results for Boost.Locale library
From: Ryou Ezoe (boostcpp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-25 15:46:50
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On Monday, April 25, 2011, Artyom wrote:
>> > From: Ryou Ezoe <boostcpp_at_[hidden]>
>> > Sort by code point is not the best Â solution.
>> > But at least, it's consistent if we use one Â encoding.
>> No it is not, UCS encoding has different order
>> in different representations:
>> UTF-8 and UTF-32 order is consistent i.e.
> Sorry if I'm adding to the pedantry, but Is UCS an "encoding"? Â My
> completely non-expert impression was that UCS was a character set, and
> UTF-8/16/32, etc. were different encodings of that character set?
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Sorry. I should say encodings of UCS.
-- Ryou Ezoe
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk