Re: [boost] [locale] Review results for Boost.Locale library

Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Review results for Boost.Locale library
From: Ryou Ezoe (boostcpp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-25 15:46:50

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday, April 25, 2011, Artyom wrote:
>> > From: Ryou Ezoe <boostcpp_at_[hidden]>
>> >
>> > Sort by code point is not the best  solution.
>> > But at least, it's consistent if we use one  encoding.
>>
>> No it is not, UCS encoding has different order
>> in different representations:
>>
>> UTF-8 and UTF-32 order is consistent i.e.
>
> Sorry if I'm adding to the pedantry, but Is UCS an "encoding"? Â My
> completely non-expert impression was that UCS was a character set, and
> UTF-8/16/32, etc. were different encodings of that character set?
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk21x6QACgkQ5vihyNWuA4WNRgCg3cNYEtR3OsoohkVIyMrkF/fI
> K0kAniA90yt0lgawTahW8+R1Y9ktoLa8
> =qO/h
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

Sorry. I should say encodings of UCS.

-- 
Ryou Ezoe