Re: [boost] Proposed documentation convention for pre-accepted libs

Subject: Re: [boost] Proposed documentation convention for pre-accepted libs
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-02 16:54:02

On 2 May 2011 21:11, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> There was work put into the doc tool chain to prevent automatic use of the
> standard Boost logo when using Boostbook. Which obviously was circumvented,
> or otherwise not used, in this case. There are options in the Boostbook
> generation for one to indicate one of the alternate logos. I don't remember
> what the default was changed to after I first changed though.

The default is to have no logo outside of boost, which I think is what
you set. I changed the settings for css and links. I also the name of
the parameter as it wasn't just changing the logo. The details are in
the documentation list archives. The countertree documentation is
using the logo markup from the website, not from boostbook. So it's
added by some sort of post-processing.