Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Proposed Release Schedule
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-14 14:10:02

on Wed Jul 13 2011, "Robert Ramey" <> wrote:

> Beman Dawes wrote:
> Also, I'm (again) offering the suggestion that the periodic testing be
> altered so that a library X on the trunk is tested againts the current
> state of the libraries on the release branch (that is the NEXT release).
> I believe this would have a number of benefits - including the
> streamlining of the release process. It would also speed up the testing
> itself since the release branch changes less frequently so there would
> be fewer dependencies for each test. This would require a change
> in the testing scripts - but not a huge one. FWIW, this is the testing
> that I do on my own machine so that it isolates my errors from any
> changes do to unknown/unexpected changes in other libaries. So
> I know from personal experience that this is an improvement.


I'm with you on this. It's one of the things we're doing with Ryppl.

Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at