Subject: Re: [boost] [fusion] html docs woes
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-18 05:10:42
On 18 July 2011 08:33, Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I think what Eric is saying is that if you have to update from SVN anyway,
> then Daniel James's solution is reasonable: redirects in subversion
> to take you to the rebuilt docs, which means that 1) when you do a regen
> of the docs, you don't commit the HTML pages 2) You upload the docs somewhere
> where you can redirect to.
> Seems reasonable...
> What I am not sure about is that it seems that the steps needed to do this
> is basically the same (or even more laborious ?) than just committing the
> HTMLs. After all, quickbook/docbook is now better at avoiding extra diffs
> from regens.
You don't have to upload the documentation yourself. Every few days I
run a script which builds and uploads the documentation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk