Re: [boost] Review Request: Singularity

Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request: Singularity
From: Alexey Tkachenko (iskaspb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-24 09:34:39

I think there are two things that require review:
1) Change in Singleton idiom (we get used to Singleton pattern);
2) Implementation of this particular library.

Regards,
Alexey.

On 22-Aug-2011, at 3:33 PM, Ben Robinson wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> This is a request for a formal review of Singularity, for inclusion into
> Boost.  The submission is attached as a compressed zip file, and is also
> publicly available for download from GitHub at
> https://github.com/icaretaker/Singularity.
> 
> The Singularity Design Pattern allows you to restrict any class to a single
> instance. Unlike the infamous Singleton, Singularity gives you direct
> control over the lifetime of the object, does not require you to grant
> global access to the object, nor does it limit you to the default
> constructor for that object.
> 
> I would like to thank the Boost community for their invaluable feedback
> regarding the features and implementation details of Singularity.  I have
> compiled and run Singularity on 4 different compilers: GCC 4.5, MSVC++ 2010,
> the Texas Instruments CL2000 compiler targeting the 2803x processor, and the
> Green Hills compiler targeting the Cortex-A8 ARM processor.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Ben Robinson, Ph.D.
> 
> P.S.  I have also implemented Singularity in C++11 using variadic templates
> and rvalue references to achieve perfect function forwarding.  These source
> files are located in the /cpp11 subdirectory, but that is not part of the
> submission, unless Boost is accepting C++11 libraries at this time.
> <icaretaker-Singularity-31482e4.zip>_______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost