Subject: Re: [boost] BOOST_FORCE_INLINE
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-09 17:31:02
On 10/9/2011 12:52 PM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> On 10/09/2011 06:56 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Mathias Gaunard
>> <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> On 10/09/2011 04:57 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
>>>> Le 09/10/11 15:30, Mathias Gaunard a écrit :
>>>>> I would like a BOOST_FORCE_INLINE macro to be added to
>>>> What do you want BOOST_FORCE_INLINE to be replaced for?
>>> As the name suggests, __forceinline or __attribute__((always_inline))
>> What compilers provide support? Do they spell it the same way?
> MSVC has __forceinline, GCC has __attribute((always_inline)), which
> other compilers probably have as well (at least XL C/C++ seems to
> support the same syntax as GCC).
Do all compilers that support the directive expect it in the same place?
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk