Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Status?
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-08 10:40:49

On 11/8/2011 6:06 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
> There are still a lot of release branch regression test failures. It
> is very uncomfortable to see failures for popular compilers such as
> VC++ 10 and GCC:
> accumulators (most or all compilers)

These tests broke several releases ago due to a change in Boost.Random,
which is only used in the Accumulator's regression tests. Steven assures
me it's not due to a bug in Random, but I still have my doubts.
Regardless, I haven't had the time to investigate, so the tests have
stayed broken. There is nothing wrong with Boost.Accumulators, though.

Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at