Subject: Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Status?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-08 10:53:05
On 11/08/2011 07:40 AM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> On 11/8/2011 6:06 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
>> There are still a lot of release branch regression test failures. It
>> is very uncomfortable to see failures for popular compilers such as
>> VC++ 10 and GCC:
>> accumulators (most or all compilers)
> These tests broke several releases ago due to a change in Boost.Random,
> which is only used in the Accumulator's regression tests. Steven assures
> me it's not due to a bug in Random, but I still have my doubts.
> Regardless, I haven't had the time to investigate, so the tests have
> stayed broken. There is nothing wrong with Boost.Accumulators, though.
I fixed all these tests in the trunk
a few weeks ago.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk