Subject: Re: [boost] Library categories
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-23 13:08:24
Le 22/11/11 23:56, Daniel James a écrit :
> On 22 November 2011 22:18, Vicente J. Botet Escriba
> <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I have committed the proposed changes as suggested in
>> Please, let me know if there is something wrong with the new categories.
> I've had a quick look and it's good. The following is all IMO so do
> disregard if you disagree. I find some of the new categories to be
> quite specific, but then so are some of the old ones.
Have you a concrete proposal of categories that can be merged or removed?
> I don't like
> 'Idioms' and 'patterns' much, maybe they could be combined, or does
> that contradict your intent?
No, Idioms and Patterns is Ok. I'll merge them.
> Miscellaneous should probably stay at the
> end, and not contain libraries that now have another home.
OK. I will put all the categories ordered lexicographically and move
Miscellaneous to the end.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk