Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Local and Phoenix idiosyncrasy
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-25 03:12:53

Next message: Ben Robinson: "[boost] Formal Review Schedule Queue"
Previous message: Nathan Ridge: "Re: [boost] New libraries implementing C++11 features in C++03"
In reply to: Thomas Heller: "[boost] Local and Phoenix idiosyncrasy"
Next in thread: Philippe Vaucher: "Re: [boost] Local and Phoenix idiosyncrasy"

On Nov 24, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Thomas Heller wrote:
> Here is what I have to propose: Why not combine Boost.Local and Boost.Phoenix and keep everybody happy?
> If the macros provided by Boost.Local would emit some instance of a phoenix::function. It would be great if this could be done completely polymorphic, maybe some tricks with boost::any?

How would you do this without putting a member template into a local class?

> In peace

Cheers,
Gordon

Next message: Ben Robinson: "[boost] Formal Review Schedule Queue"
Previous message: Nathan Ridge: "Re: [boost] New libraries implementing C++11 features in C++03"
In reply to: Thomas Heller: "[boost] Local and Phoenix idiosyncrasy"
Next in thread: Philippe Vaucher: "Re: [boost] Local and Phoenix idiosyncrasy"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk