Subject: Re: [boost] Local and Phoenix idiosyncrasy
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-25 03:12:53
On Nov 24, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Thomas Heller wrote:
> Here is what I have to propose: Why not combine Boost.Local and Boost.Phoenix and keep everybody happy?
> If the macros provided by Boost.Local would emit some instance of a phoenix::function. It would be great if this could be done completely polymorphic, maybe some tricks with boost::any?
How would you do this without putting a member template into a local class?
> In peace
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk