Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-19 13:15:29
on Mon Mar 19 2012, Daryle Walker <darylew-AT-hotmail.com> wrote:
> Git has a competitor called Mercurial? If we're moving to a
> Distributed-VCS, should we go to Mercurial instead of Git?
IMO, no. There are several reasons, but the main one is that Git is
winning in the marketplace.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk