Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?

Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-19 16:34:59

on Mon Mar 19 2012, "Hartmut Kaiser" <hartmut.kaiser-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

>> on Mon Mar 19 2012, Daryle Walker <darylew-AT-hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > Git has a competitor called Mercurial?  If we're moving to a
>> > Distributed-VCS, should we go to Mercurial instead of Git?
>> 
>> IMO, no.  There are several reasons, but the main one is that Git is
>> winning in the marketplace.
>
> You're kidding right? 

No.

> If not - let's switch Boost to Java - it's way more popular!

Is switching to Java compatible with Boost's goals in some way that I
haven't yet considered?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com