Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-19 16:34:59
on Mon Mar 19 2012, "Hartmut Kaiser" <hartmut.kaiser-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>> on Mon Mar 19 2012, Daryle Walker <darylew-AT-hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > Git has a competitor called Mercurial? If we're moving to a
>> > Distributed-VCS, should we go to Mercurial instead of Git?
>> IMO, no. There are several reasons, but the main one is that Git is
>> winning in the marketplace.
> You're kidding right?
> If not - let's switch Boost to Java - it's way more popular!
Is switching to Java compatible with Boost's goals in some way that I
haven't yet considered?
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk