Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Nathan Ridge (zeratul976_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-20 13:30:04
> > > I was using mercurial in a project a while ago. I as a command line user
> > > was pretty happy with it, but our eclipse users where not. That may
> > > have changed, since my experience is not really up to date. I have also
> > > worked on a git project, but there we did not have eclipse users, so I
> > > don't know how the well the eclipse integration works.
> > There is now an eclipse plugin called eGit (http://www.eclipse.org/egit/)
> Yes, back then there was also a mercurial plugin, which I don't think has gone
> now. It is not about the existence of such a plugin but about its quality.
> Maybe some eclipse users around here (and of course those using other IDEs)
> can test either plugin and report about the quality they experience.
This is why I mentioned that a major eclipse project (CDT) has adopted eGit.
I think that's an indication of good quality.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk