Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Status of proposed boost.overload?
From: lcaminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-24 19:15:38

calembour wrote
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 23:07:34 +0100, niXman <i.nixman@> wrote:
>> Hello list!
>> boost.overload:
>> The library will be accepted into the boost libraries ?
> Hi,
> well, lately I committed a new version to the boost sandbox that
> presents several new features and an improved documentation.
> I never proposed the library for review, I'm still waiting for
> feedbacks from the boost community.
> If you have interesting use cases, I'd like to hear from you.
> Here, you can find the library documentation:

How's this different from:

Boost.Functional/OverloadedFunction was reviewed and accepted as part of the
Boost.Local(Function) review. OverloadedFunction should in the next release.


View this message in context:
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at