Subject: Re: [boost] [Review Request] Multiprecision Arithmetic Library
From: Christopher Kormanyos (e_float_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-12 14:32:54
>>> The diffs include the removal of some non-needed constants, the trimming of
>>> max_digits10 and a minor improvement to the multiplication.
>> Hmm, that fails a number of tests with error rates > 10^10 - see for
>> example test_exp.cpp. Can you investigate?
> Never mind - I think I have it - needed to replace uses of cpp_dec_float_max_digits10 with
> cpp_dec_float_total_digits10 which does what it says, where as cpp_dec_float_max_digits10
> doesn't anymore. With that change the tests I've run pass so far.... but they're still running.
> Maybe we should rename cpp_dec_float_max_digits10 to something else?
> BTW, what's the logic behind the +1 in defining that one?
> Not that it makes much difference either which way.
> Cheers, John.
I'm starting to lose it. My brain is getting sloppy.
Sorry about all this confusion that I have caused.
I still can't build the test suite with bjam.
I will learn how to build the tests.
There are still too many constants. I still need
to eliminate a few.
Best regards, Chris.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk