Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Add BOOST_NO_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro?
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-10 15:17:20
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Committed in revision 79400.
You missed the required addition of _cxx11 to the names of the test functions:-)
I fixed those at the same time as adding the
BOOST_NO_CXX11_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro. That allowed config_info and
config_test to pass on all the gcc/intel/microsoft compilers I've got
We need to keep an eye on the full regression tests for several days
to make sure there are no snafus.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk