Re: [boost] [config] Add BOOST_NO_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro?

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Add BOOST_NO_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro?
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-10 15:54:58

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> >...
> >
> > Committed in revision 79400.
>
> You missed the required addition of _cxx11 to the names of the test
> functions:-)
>
> I fixed those at the same time as adding the
> BOOST_NO_CXX11_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro. That allowed config_info and
> config_test to pass on all the gcc/intel/microsoft compilers I've got
> installed locally.
>
> We need to keep an eye on the full regression tests for several days
> to make sure there are no snafus.
>

I thought you had changed your mind to RANGE_FOR...?

- Jeff