Re: [boost] [config] Add BOOST_NO_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro?

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Add BOOST_NO_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro?
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-10 17:48:21

On Jul 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> 
>> Committed in revision 79400.
> 
> You missed the required addition of _cxx11 to the names of the test functions:-)
> 
> I fixed those at the same time as adding the
> BOOST_NO_CXX11_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro. That allowed config_info and
> config_test to pass on all the gcc/intel/microsoft compilers I've got
> installed locally.

Great!
I checked the config test this morning; but very few had cycled.

-- Marshall

Marshall Clow     Idio Software   <mailto:mclow.lists_at_[hidden]>

A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).
        -- Yu Suzuki