Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Add BOOST_NO_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro?
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-10 17:48:21
On Jul 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Committed in revision 79400.
> You missed the required addition of _cxx11 to the names of the test functions:-)
> I fixed those at the same time as adding the
> BOOST_NO_CXX11_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro. That allowed config_info and
> config_test to pass on all the gcc/intel/microsoft compilers I've got
> installed locally.
I checked the config test this morning; but very few had cycled.
Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists_at_[hidden]>
A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).
-- Yu Suzuki
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk