Subject: Re: [boost] Is there any interest in getting pseudo random number generation using preprocessor at compile time into the Preprocessor library?
From: Alexander Stoyan (alexander.stoyan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-12 16:02:00
For example, a protected code has to be surrounded by
PROTECTION_START(level) ... PROTECTION_END() macros, where 'level' is a good
candidate for being random at compile time. In general, this feature is very
useful for many code obfuscation mechanisms. This is similar to __COUNTER__,
though not everybody use __COUNTER__ but it doesn't make it useless.
From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
On Behalf Of Steven Watanabe
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Is there any interest in getting pseudo random number
generation using preprocessor at compile time into the Preprocessor library?
On 07/12/2012 06:27 AM, Alexander Stoyan wrote:
> The complete code, approach and efficiency proofs I described in my blog:
> Need your opinion regarding the relevance and the approach correctness of
> the feature.
While this is interesting, I'm not sure
when I would ever need such a feature.
Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk