Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?

Subject: Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?
From: Gennadiy Rozenal (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-28 00:24:53

Ian Emmons <iemmons <at> bbn.com> writes:

> I can't speak for Paul, of course, but I would like it 
> if I could build Boost.Test libraries
> (libboost_unit_test_framework*) without the monitor stuff
> (libboost_test_exec_monitor* and libboost_prg_exec_monitor*).

Is this a joke? Former is deprecated long ago and later has nothing to do with 
unit testing. And either one has nothing to do with unit test framework.

Gennadiy