Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?

Subject: Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?
From: Sergey Popov (loonycyborg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-28 09:18:17

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:24:53 +0000 (UTC)
Gennadiy Rozenal <rogeeff_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Ian Emmons <iemmons <at> bbn.com> writes:
> 
> > I can't speak for Paul, of course, but I would like it 
> > if I could build Boost.Test libraries
> > (libboost_unit_test_framework*) without the monitor stuff
> > (libboost_test_exec_monitor* and libboost_prg_exec_monitor*).
> 
> Is this a joke? Former is deprecated long ago and later has nothing
> to do with unit testing. And either one has nothing to do with unit
> test framework.
The point here that both libs are built by ./b2 --with-test. And
considering what you said above it would be nice if they were
considered a separate lib for purposes of --with-whatever..