Subject: Re: [boost] [GIT] What happens to the Trac?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-17 15:39:47
on Mon Dec 17 2012, Julian Gonggrijp <j.gonggrijp-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Julian Gonggrijp wrote:
>>> All valid points, but what's wrong with keeping trac for the old
>>> issues while requesting (or perhaps just encouraging, initially) that
>>> people submit new issues to the GitHub tracker?
>> I would very much prefer to have a single tracker to work with. What's
>> the advantage of using GitHub compared to Trac?
> I'm not aware of any clear benefits of one system over the other.
> However, this thread started with John's question regarding what will
> happen now that the integration between Trac and Subversion is going
> to loose its relevance. I thought switching to GitHub might be the
> most straightforward way to regain a similar level of integration
> between issue tracker and version control.
It is more straightforward to go that way, but it's also more
disruptive. One disruption at a time, please.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing Software Development Training http://www.boostpro.com Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers C++ Boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk