Re: [boost] [GIT] What happens to the Trac?

Subject: Re: [boost] [GIT] What happens to the Trac?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-17 15:39:47

on Mon Dec 17 2012, Julian Gonggrijp <j.gonggrijp-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Julian Gonggrijp wrote:
>>> 
>>> All valid points, but what's wrong with keeping trac for the old
>>> issues while requesting (or perhaps just encouraging, initially) that
>>> people submit new issues to the GitHub tracker?
>> 
>> I would very much prefer to have a single tracker to work with. What's
>> the advantage of using GitHub compared to Trac?
>
> I'm not aware of any clear benefits of one system over the other. 
> However, this thread started with John's question regarding what will 
> happen now that the integration between Trac and Subversion is going 
> to loose its relevance. I thought switching to GitHub might be the 
> most straightforward way to regain a similar level of integration 
> between issue tracker and version control.

It is more straightforward to go that way, but it's also more
disruptive.  One disruption at a time, please.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing                  Software Development        Training
http://www.boostpro.com             Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers  C++  Boost