Subject: Re: [boost] [atomic] [release] possible linking problem with atomic
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-22 12:11:31
>>> >> That's a bit 'sad' given that 'most' platforms/compilers support builtin
>>> >> atomic operations/instructions...
>>> >> Is there anyway (e.g. define a configuration macro) to make the library work
>>> >> as header-only on those platforms (e.g. x86 and ARM)?
>> > No, currently there isn't one.
> You mean that even if I only instantiate Boost.Atomic templates for hardware/OS
> supported types while only including the header(s) (w/o explicit linking) I will
> get linker errors?
i'm not really familiar with the autolinking stuff for win32, but
checking the sources, it seems you can disable it with by defining
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk