Subject: Re: [boost] [range] [general] making member functionsSFINAE-friendly
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-21 08:08:48
On 21-02-2013 13:49, Vadim Stadnik wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Thorsten Ottosen <
>> We have no problem with containers that have different complexity
>> guarantees for certain operations. As long as the complexities are clearly
>> documented and explained.
> This is very encouraging!
> Hopefully, one day Boost community will solve the challenging problem - how
> to add augmented, advanced and other data structures to the C++ STL. For
> the beginning, there are two libraries ("STL Extensions" and "Countertree")
> in Boost review schedule:
> I am asking if anyone could volunteer to become a review manager for any of
> these libraries.
This should be a post on its own ("Review Managers wanted for XXX"), not
something announced in some unrelated thread.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk