Subject: Re: [boost] boost.config was Re: License of endian and limits in Boost detail
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-06 07:05:22
On 06-03-2013 11:48, Philip Bennefall wrote:
> The reason I bring it up is because it goes against the Boost software
> license, and since a lot of libraries seem to use boost.config and thus
> this file in some capacity, I am unsure of what parts of Boost I can use
> without including this extra requirement. it would be nice if the
> maintainer would look into this.
This is serious problem that needs to be fixed.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk