Subject: Re: [boost] boost.config was Re: License of endian and limits in Boost detail
From: Shakti Misra (shakti.misra.study_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-06 07:47:09
I also agree. In my company when I tell I use boost they ask for license. I
generally direct to BSL. But if they find out these extra conditions, then
they may question me.
Either it should be fixed or at least mentioned some where.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Thorsten Ottosen <
> On 06-03-2013 11:48, Philip Bennefall wrote:
>> The reason I bring it up is because it goes against the Boost software
>> license, and since a lot of libraries seem to use boost.config and thus
>> this file in some capacity, I am unsure of what parts of Boost I can use
>> without including this extra requirement. it would be nice if the
>> maintainer would look into this.
> This is serious problem that needs to be fixed.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/**
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk