Subject: Re: [boost] boost.config was Re: License of endian and limits in Boost detail
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-06 07:51:00
On 06/03/13 13:05, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> On 06-03-2013 11:48, Philip Bennefall wrote:
>> The reason I bring it up is because it goes against the Boost software
>> license, and since a lot of libraries seem to use boost.config and thus
>> this file in some capacity, I am unsure of what parts of Boost I can use
>> without including this extra requirement. it would be nice if the
>> maintainer would look into this.
> This is serious problem that needs to be fixed.
The code is trivial and was substantially changed anyway.
Maybe just getting rid of the copyright to SGI is an option then?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk