Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Windows Binary Builds
From: Richard (legalize+jeeves_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-16 02:02:32

Next message: Richard: "Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?"
Previous message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] Boost.Log: Any Comments? (Was: [log] Permission to merge to trunk)"
In reply to: Tom Kent: "[boost] Windows Binary Builds"
Next in thread: Tom Kent: "Re: [boost] Windows Binary Builds"
Reply: Tom Kent: "Re: [boost] Windows Binary Builds"

[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]

boost_at_[hidden] spake the secret code
<CAArKS8gQbBF82d6ffHTjuXb+eEfi1mng313vxVfbah3HSr=XXA_at_[hidden]> thusly:

>Thoughts?

Since this is already Windows specific, I would suggest WiX based
installers instead of inno setup as mentioned in your TODO file.
WiX itself is open source and uses the Windows Installer engine built
into Windows.

-- 
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
     The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
         The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
  Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>

Next message: Richard: "Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?"
Previous message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] Boost.Log: Any Comments? (Was: [log] Permission to merge to trunk)"
In reply to: Tom Kent: "[boost] Windows Binary Builds"
Next in thread: Tom Kent: "Re: [boost] Windows Binary Builds"
Reply: Tom Kent: "Re: [boost] Windows Binary Builds"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk