Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc-2013] Physics Library Abstraction Layer
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-19 04:00:10

On 4/18/2013 9:04 PM, Preston Hamlin wrote:
> I am somewhat confused as to the scope of the project, due to the previous
> posts in this thread.

I think the scope of it is what you design it to be in your proposal.

> Is the library to be built upon a specific physics library (PhysX for
> instance) by utilizing existing code in the respective SDK to abstract away
> much of the object management?

That seems like one workable option.

> Or is it meant to be built from the ground up to create generic objects,
> which can then be translated into an arbitrary format for an existing
> library?

I'm not sure what this means.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at