Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc-2013] Physics Library Abstraction Layer
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-19 04:00:10
On 4/18/2013 9:04 PM, Preston Hamlin wrote:
> I am somewhat confused as to the scope of the project, due to the previous
> posts in this thread.
I think the scope of it is what you design it to be in your proposal.
> Is the library to be built upon a specific physics library (PhysX for
> instance) by utilizing existing code in the respective SDK to abstract away
> much of the object management?
That seems like one workable option.
> Or is it meant to be built from the ground up to create generic objects,
> which can then be translated into an arbitrary format for an existing
I'm not sure what this means.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk