Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Can anyone take a quick read of an array type?
From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-09 04:28:23

> From: pbristow_at_[hidden]
> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 12:02:47 +0100
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Daryle Walker
> > Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2013 11:05 AM
> >
> > I banged out a little something at <>.
> Gulp. This would seem to be quite a BIG something?
> And that I have yet to digest :-(
> You mentioned docs but I haven't found them in the link above.

No, the other guy had docs. My library doesn't have any besides Doxygen comments. But those comments tend to be huge. I write the Doxygen comment after the declaration but before the definition. Doing those comments and figuring out a test take a lot longer than the actual code! I've added the ordered operators (< > <= >=) and the tuple interface (get, tuple_size, tuple_element). The latter assumes increments of value_type, since users would be confused if I picked any other (I.e. sub-arrays) unit. So it should be substitutable for std::array, when given 1 dimension. (If we can find a std::array demonstration program, maybe it can be applied against array_md.) I just recently added an example. It just a quick & dirty matrix class. It demonstrates in-sync updating of iterators from two different objects (of the same shape) for addition and subtraction. The core multiplication routine shows use of "apply." Daryle W.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at