|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numerictypes for unit tests?
From: Richard (legalize+jeeves_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-11 00:24:01
[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
boost_at_[hidden] spake the secret code
<1370771537.69686.YahooMailNeo_at_[hidden]> thusly:
>The names "enable_if" and "disable_if" are ambiguous
>because they are present in the namespace "boost"
>as well as in "boost::unit_test::decorator". In addition,
>there is symbol-injection via a using directive in
>Boost.Test which, although needed by Boost.Test,
>seems to cause the ambiguity.
I couldn't find any code in Boost.Test that uses the decorators
enable_if and disable_if.
They are undocumented anywhere, so I find it unlikely that any clients
of Boost.Test are depending on them from the outside.
They look like dead code to me.
-- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk