Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numerictypes for unit tests?

Subject: Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numerictypes for unit tests?
From: Richard (legalize+jeeves_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-11 00:29:06

[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]

boost_at_[hidden] spake the secret code
<1370771537.69686.YahooMailNeo_at_[hidden]> thusly:

>[...] In addition,
>there is symbol-injection via a using directive in
>Boost.Test which, although needed by Boost.Test,
>seems to cause the ambiguity.

Looking at trunk, the using directive brings the symbols into
namespace ::boost::unit_test, not ::boost.

In the bottom of decorator.hpp:

using decorator::label;
using decorator::expected_failures;
using decorator::timeout;
using decorator::description;
using decorator::depends_on;
using decorator::enable_if;
using decorator::disable_if;
using decorator::fixture;

} // namespace unit_test
} // namespace boost

-- 
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
     The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
         The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
  Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>