Subject: Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numerictypes for unit tests?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-11 02:29:50
Richard <legalize+jeeves <at> mail.xmission.com> writes:
> >The names "enable_if" and "disable_if" are ambiguous
> >because they are present in the namespace "boost"
> >as well as in "boost::unit_test::decorator". In addition,
> >there is symbol-injection via a using directive in
> >Boost.Test which, although needed by Boost.Test,
> >seems to cause the ambiguity.
I believe these were removed. Where do you see these?
> I couldn't find any code in Boost.Test that uses the decorators
> enable_if and disable_if.
> They are undocumented anywhere, so I find it unlikely that any clients
> of Boost.Test are depending on them from the outside.
> They look like dead code to me.
They are not dead. They are brand new features I am in progress of
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk