Subject: Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numerictypes for unit tests?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-11 02:31:53
Richard <legalize+jeeves <at> mail.xmission.com> writes:
> [Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
> boost <at> lists.boost.org spake the secret code
> <1370771537.69686.YahooMailNeo <at> web172406.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> thusly:
> >[...] In addition,
> >there is symbol-injection via a using directive in
> >Boost.Test which, although needed by Boost.Test,
> >seems to cause the ambiguity.
> Looking at trunk, the using directive brings the symbols into
> namespace ::boost::unit_test, not ::boost.
Exactly. There was one or two places where unit_test was injected into boost,
but these are cleared for some time now.