Subject: Re: [boost] boost-1.54 needs a bugfix!
From: Daniela Engert (dani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-07-07 01:47:00
Am 07.07.2013 00:29, schrieb Daniel James:
> On 6 July 2013 21:28, Steve M. Robbins <steve_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On July 3, 2013 05:14:07 PM Daniel James wrote:
>>> I created a maintenance branch at:
>>> And have merged in that change, and the coroutine change. I'll put
>>> them somewhere on the website soon-ish.
>> However I notice dozens of timestamp changes such as the following that
>> obscure the substantive changes. Any idea why these exist?
> Because subversion is odd?
In this case, SVN works exactly as it is told to by someone who attached
and set the svn:keywords property on a subset of boost's files: modify
the related texts accordingly ('$Date:$' in this case).
A set of diff files - one for each changeset - might get around this
I was bitten by this as well and resorted to looking at subversion's
change log only.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk