Subject: Re: [boost] unique_ptr for C++03
From: Karim Buhagiar (buhagiak_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-05 17:17:48
Why don't you old on it. I talk to my girlfriend and she should have sent the keys to you today. Maybe we can meet after you get the key and if it works for you maybe I could get my deposit back at the same time
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 5, 2013, at 4:00 PM, Howard Hinnant <howard.hinnant_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Eric Niebler <eniebler_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 8/5/2013 7:57 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>> on Sat Aug 03 2013, Eric Niebler <eniebler-AT-boost.org> wrote:
>>>> Not extensively tested. Might miss important corner cases ...
>>> FWIW, there are implementations out there that are likely to be
>>> more-tested, e.g. http://home.roadrunner.com/~hinnant/unique_ptr03.html
>> Thanks for the link. It looks like Howard and I discovered the same trick.
> I haven't been closely monitoring this thread, though I did note its existence.
> Fwiw, I was never thrilled with my C++03 emulation of unique_ptr. I don't recall exactly what doesn't work. But I think I'm correct when I say that it does not succeed in completely emulating a C++11 unique_ptr. There may be clues as to what doesn't work here: http://home.roadrunner.com/~hinnant/unique_ptr.zip
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk