Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] unique_ptr for C++03
From: Karim Buhagiar (buhagiak_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-05 17:17:48

Why don't you old on it. I talk to my girlfriend and she should have sent the keys to you today. Maybe we can meet after you get the key and if it works for you maybe I could get my deposit back at the same time



Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 5, 2013, at 4:00 PM, Howard Hinnant <howard.hinnant_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Aug 5, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Eric Niebler <eniebler_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 8/5/2013 7:57 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>> on Sat Aug 03 2013, Eric Niebler <> wrote:
>>>> Not extensively tested. Might miss important corner cases ...
>>> FWIW, there are implementations out there that are likely to be
>>> more-tested, e.g.
>> Thanks for the link. It looks like Howard and I discovered the same trick.
> I haven't been closely monitoring this thread, though I did note its existence.
> Fwiw, I was never thrilled with my C++03 emulation of unique_ptr. I don't recall exactly what doesn't work. But I think I'm correct when I say that it does not succeed in completely emulating a C++11 unique_ptr. There may be clues as to what doesn't work here:
> Howard
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at