Subject: Re: [boost] Releasing Boost Dependency Analyzer 1.1
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-09 06:43:26
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, at 12:20 PM, Jens Weller wrote:
> libraries.xml as a lib name source is nice, but not quite perfect. I've
> seen different results from maintainers.txt and libraries.xml.
> As maintainers.txt also libraries.xml contains duplicates, some of its
> library names don't fit the expectation of bcp, so I applied some fixes
> for this in my program.
If you filter by version there aren't any duplicates, they're there
because the details of libraries changes from version to version.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk