Subject: Re: [boost] [Interprocess] Named pipe interface proposal
From: yuri kilochek (yuri.kilochek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-12 01:09:53
Why not derive from std::streambuf overriding appropriate functions? Isn't
it the standard way to deal with custom data streams?
10 Ð°Ð²Ð³. 2013 Ð³. 11:42 Ð¿Ð¾Ð»ÑÐ·Ð¾Ð²Ð°ÑÐµÐ»Ñ "Geoff Shannon" <geoffpshannon_at_[hidden]>
> I emailed the list a while ago that I was starting to work on a named pipe
> implementation for potential inclusion in the Boost.Interprocess library,
> and now I finally have some concrete evidence of progress. I've come up
> with a header file for my proposed interface and I would really appreciate
> any and all feedback on it.
> Particularly, I'm interested in ideas for an appropriate replacement for
> using char *'s as the data buffers for reading and writing.
> As a point of interest this interface is meant to be extremely simple. I
> don't intend to initially support ANYTHING except for basic creation and
> reading and writing.
> -- Geoff
> Nothing is ever easy.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk