Re: [boost] [Interprocess] Named pipe interface proposal

Subject: Re: [boost] [Interprocess] Named pipe interface proposal
From: yuri kilochek (yuri.kilochek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-12 01:09:53

Why not derive from std::streambuf overriding appropriate functions? Isn't
it the standard way to deal with custom data streams?
10 авг. 2013 г. 11:42 пользователь "Geoff Shannon" <geoffpshannon_at_[hidden]>
написал:

> I emailed the list a while ago that I was starting to work on a named pipe
> implementation for potential inclusion in the Boost.Interprocess library,
> and now I finally have some concrete evidence of progress.  I've come up
> with a header file for my proposed interface and I would really appreciate
> any and all feedback on it.
>
> Particularly, I'm interested in ideas for an appropriate replacement for
> using char *'s as the data buffers for reading and writing.
>
> As a point of interest this interface is meant to be extremely simple.  I
> don't intend to initially support ANYTHING except for basic creation and
> reading and writing.
>
> Thanks!
> -- Geoff
>
> Nothing is ever easy.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>