Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)
From: Klaim - Joël Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-18 10:37:01


On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Joel Falcou <joel.falcou_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
> Versionning exist for a reason. Modern boost development using C++11 and
> forward should move to a 2.0 version. Old compilers will be supported in
> the 1.x branch.
> End of the story.

[sidenote]
I agree with Joel, I always assumed (few years ago) that that's what would
happen and I'm still surprised it's not seriously considered. I guess
that's a discussion for post-modularization but I
fear that this discussion will get in limbo and hurt boost like the issues
with the review process.
[/sidenote]


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk