Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)
From: Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-18 10:37:01
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Joel Falcou <joel.falcou_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Versionning exist for a reason. Modern boost development using C++11 and
> forward should move to a 2.0 version. Old compilers will be supported in
> the 1.x branch.
> End of the story.
I agree with Joel, I always assumed (few years ago) that that's what would
happen and I'm still surprised it's not seriously considered. I guess
that's a discussion for post-modularization but I
fear that this discussion will get in limbo and hurt boost like the issues
with the review process.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk