Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)

Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-18 12:28:09

On 10/18/2013 11:59 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 05:42 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
>>
>> The property_map library can be used completely outside of the graph
>> library. What does moving parts of property_map into graph accomplish ?
>
> It makes the property_map library/repo/package not depend on the graph
> library/repo/package.

The property_map library is a header only library. Please point out to 
me where in the property_map headers there is any reference to anything 
in the graph library.

>
> 'can be used' is the wrong thought process. You need to consider the
> union of dependencies of include files in a package. Those are the
> dependencies of the package.
>
> Note also that I am repeating myself. My initial mail contained this:
>
>> There are 104 nodes and 1159 edges. Each edge is a real dependency which
>> exists between repos, and which will exist between boost modularized
>> packages. They should not be considered optional.
>
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/245078
>
> I also mentioned dependencies between repos/libraries several times in
> that mail, and particularly pointed out that I'm not talking about
> file-level dependency in this mail in response to you:
>
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/245078/focus=245101