Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)

Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)
From: Stephen Kelly (steveire_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-21 04:53:45

On 10/18/2013 07:04 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 12:37 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> On 10/18/2013 06:28 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
>>> On 10/18/2013 11:59 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>>> On 10/18/2013 05:42 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The property_map library can be used completely outside of the graph
>>>>> library. What does moving parts of property_map into graph
>>>>> accomplish ?
>>>>
>>>> It makes the property_map library/repo/package not depend on the graph
>>>> library/repo/package.
>>>
>>> The property_map library is a header only library. Please point out to
>>> me where in the property_map headers there is any reference to
>>> anything in the graph library.
>>>
>>
>> Le-sigh.
>>
>> I suggest you do your equivalent of this:
>>
>>   boost-trunk/boost/property_map{master}$ git grep boost/graph
>>
>> I won't ruin the surprise for you by pasting the output.
>>
>> If you don't understand my point after seeing the output, please just
>> accept that you don't understand the point. No need to respond. A long
>> sub-thread like this is bad.
>
> No a sub-thread like this is not bad. When you feel entitled to do
> things without valid justification that is bad. And when you talk in
> condescending terms to others that is bad. 

I was more coarse and insensitive than necessary in dealing with and
responding to this subject.

I want to apologise for that and I'll do my best to make sure it doesn't
happen again.

Thanks,

Steve.