Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)

Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-21 10:25:28

On 10/21/2013 4:53 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 07:04 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
>> On 10/18/2013 12:37 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>> On 10/18/2013 06:28 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
>>>> On 10/18/2013 11:59 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>>>> On 10/18/2013 05:42 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The property_map library can be used completely outside of the graph
>>>>>> library. What does moving parts of property_map into graph
>>>>>> accomplish ?
>>>>>
>>>>> It makes the property_map library/repo/package not depend on the graph
>>>>> library/repo/package.
>>>>
>>>> The property_map library is a header only library. Please point out to
>>>> me where in the property_map headers there is any reference to
>>>> anything in the graph library.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Le-sigh.
>>>
>>> I suggest you do your equivalent of this:
>>>
>>>    boost-trunk/boost/property_map{master}$ git grep boost/graph
>>>
>>> I won't ruin the surprise for you by pasting the output.
>>>
>>> If you don't understand my point after seeing the output, please just
>>> accept that you don't understand the point. No need to respond. A long
>>> sub-thread like this is bad.
>>
>> No a sub-thread like this is not bad. When you feel entitled to do
>> things without valid justification that is bad. And when you talk in
>> condescending terms to others that is bad.
>
> I was more coarse and insensitive than necessary in dealing with and
> responding to this subject.
>
> I want to apologise for that and I'll do my best to make sure it doesn't
> happen again.

Your apology is gratefully accepted. The mistake was mine, but I am 
human also.

I think the work you are doing on Boost modularization is invaluable.