Subject: Re: [boost] [git help] Documenting common modular boost workflows
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-21 10:15:34
Dave Abrahams wrote:
> IIUC we already agreed long ago to use gitflow:
It's not entirely clear to me what using gitflow would mean in the context
of a Boost superproject with per-library submodules. Who is "we" who would
be using gitflow, the Boost release managers or the library maintainers?
When Boost release 1.64.0 is started, who is going to create the gitflow
release branch, and from what?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk