Re: [boost] VC2013 1.55 beta failures

Subject: Re: [boost] VC2013 1.55 beta failures
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-23 16:11:43

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Frank Mori Hess <fmh6jj_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Beman Dawes wrote:
> >>
> >> Should we continue to define BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES for VC++
> >> 2013, or should we not define it and get signals2 working with a problem
> >> specific workaround?
> >
> >
> > Get signals2 working, I'd say. The variadic constructor is already a bit
> > broken in that it incorrectly accepts zero arguments, so why not just
> > constrain it to two or more.
> >
> > template<class A1, class A2, class... Args>
> > slot( A1 const& a1, A2 const& a2, Args const&... args )
> > { ... }
> >
>
> That sounds fine by me.  I can commit the change to trunk tonight,
> should I also commit it to release, or wait for tests to cycle?
>

I've just committed (r86408), the BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES removal
for VS 2013, but will wait roughly 24-hours to give tests a chance to cycle
before merging to trunk. Why don't you do the same? That still meets the
Monday for merging to release without having to ask permission.

Thanks,

--Beman