Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] VC2013 1.55 beta failures
From: Frank Mori Hess (fmh6jj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-23 14:34:28

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Beman Dawes wrote:
>> Should we continue to define BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES for VC++
>> 2013, or should we not define it and get signals2 working with a problem
>> specific workaround?
> Get signals2 working, I'd say. The variadic constructor is already a bit
> broken in that it incorrectly accepts zero arguments, so why not just
> constrain it to two or more.
> template<class A1, class A2, class... Args>
> slot( A1 const& a1, A2 const& a2, Args const&... args )
> { ... }

That sounds fine by me. I can commit the change to trunk tonight,
should I also commit it to release, or wait for tests to cycle?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at