Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Modularizing Boost (modularization)
From: Stephen Kelly (steveire_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-01 05:37:58
On 11/01/2013 10:10 AM, Bjørn Roald wrote:
> On 11/01/2013 09:21 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> On 10/18/2013 12:24 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>> If the dependencies between repositories are analysed, the result is
>> I'm still at a loss to reason with pushing forward with git migration
>> instead of making these changes which have demonstrated edge removal,
>> are valuable and are are easy cheap and quick.
> Please give some short references or explanation about what you expect
> to become harder to do after the migration.
Working with git submodules adds layers of 'hardness'.
'git grep' does not pierce submodules for one thing. A lightweight
ad-hoc use of it becomes a heavier script full of necessary tricks such
as adding '|| true' and quoting problems.
For example, to acquire the numbers I pasted here:
I first tried to get the answer from the modularized repos.
While I can do this:
git log --oneline --author=steveire | read; echo $?'
I could find no way of wrapping that in a git submodule foreach.
Git submodules make horizontal work (ie, the kind of work that I've been
> I guess if migration plans are to be reconsidered there may need to be
> a clear understanding why the added work or complexity you are
> implying is worth waiting for.
This mail is just an explanation to your query, not asking for
> You should probably propose a new date for git migration with a viable
> rationale. Just saying you don't understand why migration is not on
> hold is not really fair.
Sorry, I don't intend to be unfair, and I'm not going to propose a new date.
My closing remark (the most unimportant in my mail imo) was only
pointing out that I don't understand the decision. There is a *lot* of
low-hanging fruit which is easy, cheap and valueable to pick.
Maybe it's best if you ignore my closing remark. There is nothing deeper
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk