Subject: Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Radix-2 typedef naming convention
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-06 12:02:36
>> One other suggestion:
>> which keeps the "cuteness" and link to the names of the hardware types,
>> but the cpp_ prefix
> indicates it's
>> a software emulation?
> I think I like these a bit better - except that should they be
> I know it's more to type, but it's important that they are recognised as a
> binary type?
Those are rather similar to:
to me, which have their digit counts in base 10.
> Is double always 64 bit and float always 32?
> And quad isn't a float-point type yet?
It may be long double on some platforms.
Still painting the bike shed yours, John.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk